Being in an intercultural context can be quite a challenge.
It doesn't have to be, but it can be. It we don’t pay attention, if we’re only
looking to accommodate our own comfort, it’s not that big a challenge. If we
are truly trying to engage and understand the culture? Participate? Have real
friendships and relationships with other people? It’s a challenge.
All my life, I've often thought about how much easier it would be
if I would just accept the norms. The problem is, I have a little trouble accepting norms, especially if they hurt people. I seem to have
a different set of rules and perhaps they very rarely comply with what is socially
acceptable. I like to think my rules are really just one: Do unto others as you
would have done unto you. That’s the Golden Rule and some version of it is
found in every single religion in the world. This rule seems to be the most
perfect rule for human interaction. Free of cultural bias, social norms and
traditions, punishment, power and judgment. And it’s always worked for me.
Unless I get distracted.
Today I had an epiphany. I've been working on lots of things
that I've yet to publicize based on my recent experiences.
The basic definition I've followed to describe this kind of culture is this one:
The conundrum for me has been that in
the US, we focus on the "good" or "evil" behavior of others and what they “are” rarely matters. For
example, “He’s a personal injury attorney BUT HE’S NICE”. Here, it seems that
what you “are” is what is most important and you must choose the behaviors
expected of you. “He’s a PERSONAL INJURY ATTORNEY but he’s nice”. What I
realized today is that both ways are wrong. Both are ways to determine the value of
another human being. (Needless to say I believed that actions should be
everything – anything as superficial as position or social status is obviously
useless, but don’t we all know that actions can be acts, like being nice?)
A person’s actions and a person’s status are important. Both
cultures place values on those things, but when one trumps the other, that’s
when there’s an issue. For instance, what is NICE?
Even though I come from The South (a known shame culture, as
well, but includes an action-based concept of “honor”)
and I think I know NICE, it’s different in different places. The short end of
the story is that we have to be able to experience more of a person. We
actually have to build relationship. And that’s the hard part. Who has time for
that? Isn't it easier to follow the established criteria?
There’s an awesome sermon by the Rev. Mike Kinman I used in some of my
English classes called "Eye Contact". I hope you’ll take a few minutes to read it. It’s worth it. The message is that we are taught early on not
to enter into true relationship with other people, especially if they appear to
be different or are “the other” (whoever that may be for you). Another reading I regularly used is this one,
by Sebastian Junger (also wrote “A Perfect Storm”) called "Welcome Stranger". Both these
pieces deal with how we interact with other people. And both depict beautifully
what it means to build relationship, true relationship, one based not on social
norms and values, but on the value of a human being. A human being. That’s all.
And the world is full of us.
Now, back to my story. I was having so much trouble because
I got distracted and started applying the “action” based value system rather
than the “eye contact” or “welcome stranger” influences that are more in line
with the “Do Unto Others” method. I can argue that I was at the receiving end
of the status based value system and my cultural mechanism jumped in, but that’s
a long, yucky story. This story is beautiful!
Sometimes, our cultural ways have nothing to do with love,
kindness, status, or actions, but POWER. Plain and simple. Power to keep
another person in their place. Power to prevent full participation in the
marketplace of ideas. We often use the unearned power of privilege due to race,
religion, gender, etc. to promote the results we want (or to justify a behavior
or status that we want) We can hide behind all kinds of cultural things and say
that what we've done is justified. For instance, I’m from the US and we value
honesty so I can say “Your outfit is really atrocious and I can’t believe you
wore that to work” and then say ‘oh, I’m from the US and we’re just honest.” In
this context in which being ambiguous and intentionally misleading is
an art form, (certainly not malicious, but considerate and conversational, as
well) ignorance can be claimed and excused, or intentional lies can be given to
“save face”. The thing is, when culture is employed to excuse a harmful action,
often the action was not meant to uplift, affirm, empower or encourage. Both
examples are of pure meanness, likely power related, and using culture to excuse it.
Enter “Do Unto Others”. When we treat others the way we’d
like to be treated, the cultural things take a back seat. Maybe it’s being
kind. Maybe it’s just being honest. Or maybe not. But the kicker is that we’re
basing our behavior on something other than power; on love. Love of self, maybe, but
love. And love never fails.
And that’s how to build relationship.